this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
227 points (96.3% liked)

PC Gaming

12743 readers
558 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
227
Valve makes almost $50 million per employee, raking in more cash per person than Google, Amazon, or Microsoft — gaming giant's 350 employees on track to generate $17 billion this year (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 7 hours ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
86 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't get it. Are there any sources for this?

Are you saying the more people get paid the less work they do? This doesn't make sense to me. This sounds like a management and hiring issue. If someone doesn't want to work, you replace them with someone who does. Don't hire lazy fucks, hire competent people.

If I had a job that pays say 1 million a year, and I know I won't be able to get paid nowhere near as much at another company, I would make sure I work hard enough not lose that amazingly paid job, because otherwise I will have to work for half that and give up my rich lifestyle.

Again, a management issue for letting employees become zombies and a hiring issue for hiring lazy bums.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The research is mostly about overpaying, not high but equal pay for everyone doing the same job. It happens when people compare their effort to others' and if they feel over-rewarded it can actually lead to two outcomes:

  • Increasing effort to justify it, or
  • reducing effort

And the evidence is actually mixed between the two outcomes, because different people respond differently to different incentives, like flexibility, holidays, etc.

Equity theory mostly applies only when the work is measurable and the teams/individuals compare themselves constantly.

IMO this can be solved by better management and equal pay for equal work/skillset.

There are also other incentives that can crowd out internal motivation, such as surveillance, pressure, inequality. But obviously management doesn't want to talk about those, much more profitable to reduce the pay.

High pay alone doesn't really trigger crowding out.

I still maintain my position that this is largely a management and greed issue. And high and equal pay alone doesn't create a lazy, zombie workforce.

Here's some studies and theories arguing the opposite:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33705159/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency_wage

https://wol.iza.org/uploads/articles/275/pdfs/efficiency-wages-variants-and-implications.pdf