this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18671 readers
683 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

that’s not even the most incompetent part imo

the fact that the missile tries to change direction too quickly and just breaks itself apart from the aerodynamic pressure is crazy… it’s literally hobby robotics 101 to put limits on acceleration etc

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 12 minutes ago

It's just the life of each software dev: don't need to account for this situation, because the target would never move by 10000kms within seconds. Plus, the buyer would never bring a failed unit back to ask for a refund, so why bother and spend more on development. Unless it's a liquid fuel rocket, you wouldn't be able to change Trust and speed once fired.