this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
735 points (96.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

38219 readers
1267 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is no true definition of middle class. People making only $30k a month consider themselves middle class and people making $1 million also think they are middle class.

[–] GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is no 'middle' class. There is only ownership and labour.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I would argue there are at least 3 classes:

  • The impoverished class that makes their living from the charity of others

  • The working class that makes their living from their labor

  • The ownership class that makes their living from owning things

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You basically can't live on charity one of the classes you mentioned almost doesn't exist

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

in sane countries you actually can go quite far on charity alone, most every civilized place on earth outside of the US fully understands that most crime is done out of desperation than anything else...so they insure there are plentiful safety nets.

rock bottom in austrailia doesn't compare to rock bottom in (insert red state of choice)

[–] GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but in a more just system, the impoverished class would barely exist, if at all.

[–] cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but in a more just system, class would not exist, at all.

FTFY :P

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 21 hours ago

How about those that own things and control people so much that they can somehow get enough charity to live off it?
I somehow fail to understand how that manages to be a viable method.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is only ~~ownership~~ parasites and labour.

FTFY. You’re welcome.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

There are people who are fully owners and don't do any labour, and those who subsist entirely on their labour and don't own anything. Would it be fair to say that the middle class is anyone who works but still owns a non-zero amount of appreciating or revenue-generating assets?

[–] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If we guesstimate middle class by comparable lifestyle when the term was coined, it starts around 250k in today money. Comfortable house, lots of kids, multiple cars (but not luxury), at least one real traveling vacation every year, never worrying about paying bills or buying food, all while saving enough to retire by 55. There aren't many people in the US with the income to match that. I'd say the middle class is dead.

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I always take the middle class as the threshold where you have sufficient passive income to afford a dignified lifestyle without needing to work anymore but may choose to.

Examples would be landlords with a decent portfolio, business owners where all the work is done for them, and people with substantial savings and investments.

If you have to work to pay the bills, no matter how much you're on, you're working class. This can even include millionaires in high cost lifestyles.

If you're so rich that you no longer need to care about the value of money then you are upper class.

[–] GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

"I always take the middle class as the threshold where you have sufficient passive income ... Examples would be landlords"

Please don't bring parasites into this

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

That's a lot of caveats.