779
Military service will reportedly no longer classify 'divisive' swastika as 'hate' symbol
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
779 points (97.6% liked)
politics
26422 readers
3404 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know its a drama we're past by now but I can't help but think about the people who defended Platner with the line "the military would have stopped him if it was really a Nazi tattoo." Because most of us knew that in fact they would not, and now they have put it in writing.
Platner said that the marines actually rejected his reenlistment for having ~~death's head~~ forearm tattoos (even though he says got it while in the marines and that it was a common tattoo for marines to have) so he had to join the army out desperation. He really was determined to go back over there and kill more brown people.
Can you give a source on that or a general direction on where to look? I've heard about the tattoo and looked into it during the initial controversy and did not find that information at the time.
collapsed inline media
I must've misread. He actually says the marines rejected him for having visible tattoos on his arm, not the actual skull tattoo.
If you know about MARADMIN, can you elaborate on what he means? I looked it up and understand it as a kind of code of conduct, but don't see what changed in 2007, just that he said a USMC based tattoo was what prevented him.
Sorry, that's esoteric military gibberish shit. I have no idea.
Thanks anyway! Yeah military jargon and acronyms out the ass go hand in hand and any manager that's a vet I've worked for just tosses them around like 'sentence enhancers'.
MARADMIN 198/07
Thank you for this. I gave it a good (confusing) read, they could stand to type in less capitals.
I can see the regulations outlined, but not that he was turned away for it being a known nazi symbol or anything based on that description, it sounds like he got a tattoo without clearing it or reporting it on his paperwork and chose not to appeal, based on his words there in the reddit post.
I appreciate you finding that for me, it was hard to parse all the google garbage
But I thought he didn't know what it was? So he thought they rejected his reenlistement because of a regular skull tattoo?
Sketchy af
He was in the Marines, they aren't known for being particularly bright outside of maybe the specialists, NCOs, and COs. They ain't called America's greatest crayon eaters for nothing, but hey since the 80s or so theyve diversified their eating habits with MRE wrappers and chemical heaters.
I grew up round Vietnam era army mud boots, I will take any opportunity to bash the Marines.
So then he's not bright enough to serve in Congress. Either he knew, which is bad, or he was too stupid to know, which is also bad.
Would really depend on if he has improved since then, I'm from the opposite side of the county so I don't have too much horse in this race so I am too ignorant to say if he has improved or not. Youd have to do actual research on him and frankly speaking I don't give a damn I just want to make haha Marines stupid jokes.
Why is it that if he's a dumb young 20 he can't gain any intelligence? Why is the line I keep seeing from people "well he didn't know at the time, and that's damning enough", like, do you know anyone who has ever signed up for the military at 18-25 to bd 'smart' or informed?