this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
711 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

8561 readers
937 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 89 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The one that lists sheets is at least using a verifiable metric. It's better than the "right rolls of unspecified size are more than 39 different rolls of unspecified size".

Still silly because no one knows how many sheets they use before changing the roll, but at least it's reasonable silly.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 30 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Isn't it the same problem tho, since they can make the sheets smaller and say there's more without actually offering a longer roll?

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need legally defined toilet paper roll standards.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lets setup some ISO standards for shit wipers.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I would be shocked if there isn't already one. The trick is getting companies to adhere to it.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Helps that they tend to be square-ish, there's a subsection of people who would notice immediately if you can't fold perfect paper cranes from a single sheet while you're pooping.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

pretty sure they are rectangles

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Oh, totally. It's by no means a good measurement, it's just the only one that's in some way tied to anything tangible. "8=39" doesn't mean anything.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Which matters more total kg or mm^2^ ?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kg for sure, i wouldn't trust tp with a low cost per mm²

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I also don't trust a toilet paper with a low gsm.

Maybe we need both a gsm and total weight labeling.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The label usually says total surface area in the package. The stores near me break the price down to cost per unit of area, as well. This really untangles the 'how much should I pay for a quadrahedroll vs a dodecca butt sphere" worth of paper?

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Username checks out!