this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
328 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22605 readers
4971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


Louis DeJoy has resigned as postmaster general of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) amid uncertainty about the agency’s future under President Trump.

DeJoy had notified the USPS board of directors in February that it was “time for them to begin the process of identifying his successor.” His resignation on Monday expedites that process and leaves Deputy Postmaster General Doug Tulino in charge until a permanent replacement is found.

“While our management team and the men and women of the Postal Service have established the path toward financial sustainability and high operating performance – and we have instituted enormous beneficial change to what had been an adrift and moribund organization – much work remains that is necessary to change our positive trajectory,” DeJoy said in a statement first reported by Reuters.

DeJoy had served as Postmaster General since May 2020. He previously donated to GOP political campaigns.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 131 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Famous for trying to sabotage ballot delivery during the 2020 election to help Trump.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And biden didn't get rid of him... it's like the dems aren't even trying.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Biden couldn't get rid of him. Look up the process for getting a new one.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trump is managing to get rid of whole fucking departments and Biden couldn’t get rid of a snake in a mailbox.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It does seem ludicrous, but would Biden doing things illegally be better? Everything Trump has done goes against the very principle of the country, so he's not the benchmark we need, even though he's "accomplishing" so much more by doing it wrongly.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Surely there's a middle ground between "laws don't matter" and "it's too bad we can't do anything at all". Dems don't even pretend to try.

[–] fake_meows@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Presidents were above the law for the final year of Biden's term.

He chose to do nothing.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone says this, but it was dependent upon the SCROTUS determining that it was an "official act." Guess how many things a Democrat did would be decided to be an official act by them?

[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

Everything. It wasn't up to them. According to their ruling it's up to the prosecutor or movant, without being able to subpoena any involved, to prove anything a president does is not an official act.

Since that's an impossible bar to clear with clear scotus ruling, every judge must dismiss, prejudicially, any charge against a president without the president doing anything.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah! Joe Biden sucks ass! He should have broken the law more! oh wait wtf

Thank you for summarizing the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

EXACTLY!!! So many people are trying to go after trump but we all know that biden is still the real enemy. Its why the palestinians still have it so hard. Hes the real deep state. /s /s /s /s /s /s................................................

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not blaming Biden. Jesus. Trump is bad and also not good. I can still be mad at my own political party for bringing a spoon to a gun fight.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago

I get that I just hate when the public discourse seems to be lets not focus on the real problem. You want me to not vote dem all we have to do is have republicans consistently lose the presidency and have less than 25% of congress.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't they not fill seats on the board?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Biden did appoint a number of them, but there can't be more than five of a party affiliation, and removal of the PMG requires an absolute majority of those board members. The question needs to be why none or not enough of them feel he's a problem.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Yes, he could have. He needed to wait until the composition of the board changed, and once that happened, they did absolutely nothing to get rid of DeJoy.

Once again, the Dems were more concerned with potential Republican criticism than honoringntheir oath of office, and protecting American citizens from domestic enemies.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Bullshit. Biden eventually appointed a majority of the postal board. If he had selected appointees based on their opposition to DeJoy he would've been gone. But for some reason, Biden didn't bother.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He could have, but had excuses. There were always excuses here, there , in hundreds of things that were not done, never intended to be done.

Ultimately it was worth more to allow the sabotage to continue rather than pay the political price.

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, he couldn't. Biden literally could not just fire him. That's not how the Postmaster General works. The committee that controls who the PMG is, would not fire him.

Biden has absolutely no control over who the PMG is. He couldn't fire Dejoy. He couldn't assign a new PMG.

Don't be stupid about something you know nothing of.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He had no control over the postmaster general. He only had control over a majority of the people who vote for him...

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And he appointed 5 of them. You are aware you can't force people to do something if you're a half decent person, right? Like, free will is a thing, and unless I'm mistaken, Biden isn't the leader of a cult, nor does he have mind control powers, last I checked.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JFC, you can absolutely make selecting someone contingent on their plan to vote against an postmaster general intent on destroying the service. What do you think the process is, just evaluating the cut of their jib and crossing his fingers hoping they'll advance his policy interests?

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I will never understand how people can blindly defend Biden, or even think that the destruction of infrastructure on a massive scale is business as usual. Or cannot be stopped under any circumstance.

Perhaps you and others have no clue of the extent of the damage , or perhaps you don’t care? Perhaps it makes you feel better to think nothing could be done.

Honestly feel contempt at this moment

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

you do realize THE BOG are the one that can remove dejoy right?

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'll never understand people so willfully ignorant like you. Refusal to believe facts because they don't fit your narrative. I wish I could be as blissfully ignorant as you are, but I'm cursed with the ability to learn, and educate myself. You're fortunate you are not.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, really. Legally the President can't touch that position. I've got my pitchfork out too, but this isn't one of the things to go after.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He could have allowed criminal charges against DeJoy, it’s hard to keep one’s position if convicted and serving a multi year sentence.

DeJoy destroyed so much of the infrastructure that he could have easily been charged for dozens of things, even murder when prescribed medications were lost by the tens of thousands due to the backlogs he created.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did Biden stop charges against him? Would that stop him from keeping the position, legally? Honest questions.

I know it's frustrating, but there are processes in place, and sometimes people find ways to use that to their advantage to do evil.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who knows? I would like to think that; my point is, that if Biden officially recognized what was happening , and made it a point to try to stop the damage, then lots of options come open after that.

But, he ignored that: we will never know

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

For what broken laws? What law, specifically, did he break? Being a piece of shit doesn't break any laws.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

only the BOG couldve gotten rid of dejoy

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

like

Industrial strength like you've got there.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

kinda wierd he dint do anything for 4 years, after he sabotaged the post office? was he hoping it for it to immediately fall apart and pick apart the corpses? i know the first thing he did was eliminate OT initially for employees.