this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
131 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

68187 readers
3703 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (23 children)

What is the use case for 127000 PPI?
AFAIK retina start about 450 for phones, that are already pretty close view.
The closest id probably VR that can utilize 1000+. (AFAIK 2000 is REALLY good!)
But that leaves more than a factor 60 that I can't see much of a use case for?
VR can maybe use 5000, I seriously doubt it will make any difference above that.

So where is more than 5000 necessary?

[–] Amroth@feddit.it 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Very creative, maybe some day. But I think it will require serious developments in other areas too. Like technologies we don't even have yet.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we already have tiny flexible screens and the means to beam video data to it wirelessly. we also have microscopic chip litography to handle it.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But no small or translucent batteries

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

the obvious solution to this problem is running a convenient wire from your eyeball 🤪

[–] monarch@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

don't necessarily need one if they are power efficent enough.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

How would you power them without a battery? It doesn't matter if it's really power efficient if it isn't getting any power.

[–] monarch@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wirelessly. Like an NFC tag.

Not saying it would be super practical but if you custom shaped them you could put a wire coil around all of the non seeing parts of the eye.

[–] dzsimbo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Just make it sodium based, and a good crying jag will replenish the battery.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

you can beam tiny amounts of it ota. it just needs to be very power efficient.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

im not saying it wouldnt be a challenge, but isnt solar panel tech possible here?

it just has to be really power efficient.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

127000 PPI e-ink display. Allows transparency.

Needs some kind of extremely tiny body heart driven power source, WiFi chip and processor...

Closer and closer to cyberpunk era tech (and oppression)

load more comments (20 replies)