this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

10678 readers
360 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canadian politicians have increasingly taken to social media to campaign as well as communicate with constituents, sharing updates on policies, local events, emergencies or government initiatives.

But stories have emerged of constituents being blocked by their representatives. Should Canadian politicians be free to block their own constituents?

Some politicians claim the blocking is to combat increased online harassment, while constituents have claimed that simply being critical of policies or initiatives is enough to get them blocked.

Some recent cases in Canada include federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault being asked to unblock Ezra Levant on X in 2023, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith blocking constituents on X in 2023 and Montréal Mayor Valérie Plante blocking comments on X and Instagram in 2024. In 2018, Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson was sued by three local Ottawa activists after blocking them on X.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I guess in a sense politicians' social media profiles create a platform for others to spread their message by interacting with the politicians' posts. So when Guilbeault posts something that gains traction, then Ezra replies, that gets his reply a lot of exposure. In that sense, maybe there is a point to allow blocking, in that it denies such figures this platform. A perhaps better solution would be for Guilbeault to have a social media army that ratios Ezra by debunking his bullshit. But could be very difficult if not impossible given how much easier it is for an actor like Ezra to generate bullshit compared to debunking it. It would educate his followers though and perhaps deflate his influence.