this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
37 points (87.8% liked)

Hacker News

3027 readers
310 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

$850 a week sounds a little nuts to me, let alone 4 days, and not in consumer spending.

10s of trillions of dollars of activity a day

Our entire GDP isn't $30T yet. I'm really questioning these numbers.

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

$850 in 4 days is total yearly spending averaged daily, which only requires a household income of $80k/year.

$29T can be described as tens of trillions, that isn't wrong at all?

[–] dangrousperson@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

GDP is yearly, not daily

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Oh, it's definitely far bigger than GDP. Not all financial activity factors into GDP but it's all part of the general movement of money that factors into inflation.
A lot of money is used for things that aren't counted as "production", like investments or used goods.
More than half of the worlds trade is conducted in dollars and there's even larger flows of money involved in foreign exchange on a daily basis.
There's just so much money churning around that reducing the supply by $300B isn't a big dent, particularly when most of it's already effectively out of circulation.

The ~$200 a day figure is right from bls and tracks consumer spending, notably including housing costs.
https://www.bls.gov/cex/.
It's about $100 a day if you remove housing and transportation. About $25 on food and $10 on "fun" a day, with $16 of that food being consumed groceries.