Linux

Thing is, most LLM submissions are low-quality as well as low-effort. If you forbid them, well-meaning numbskulls will hopefully not clutter your bug tracker by submitting them, and those who are more interested in adding a line to their resume than following the rules can be blacklisted immediately for breaking said rules. As for the odd undeclared one that's not low-quality and slips through without being spotted, no big deal. By my understanding, they're unicorns, though.

Because the submissions are so low-quality overall, chances are that projects requiring that submitters admit there was an LLM involved in their submission will end up effectively shadow-banning most such submitters because it isn't worth wading through their tripe. That's just a different version of non-transparency.

The endgame we want isn't blacklisting LLM submissions into perdition, it's the code version of xkcd 810. Currently, most LLM code submissions are about as useful and desirable as porn spam on a forum. Maybe in a few years, that'll be different. If it is, policies can be reviewed.