this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
259 points (95.1% liked)

Not The Onion

18625 readers
1749 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't the pope already say it was sacrilegious to do this?

All the AIs are trained on public domain texts like the bible, just prompt your favorite AI to take on the role.

But there are issues of perspective even within the bible, like who are the reliable narrators? Who was pushing an obvious agenda or how was the text changed in the ensuing millennia? AI is not a biblical scholar, that's a whole different, more complex concept.

People will just use this as confirmation bias of whatever they want to believe about the bible.

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 1 points 2 hours ago

People will just use this as confirmation bias of whatever they want to believe about the bible.

Methinks this is the point, create silo'd echo chambers that are tailored to the individual's biases. They can't possibly keep up with all the different denominations and their particular spin on interpreting the bible, nor do they care to. AI, though, can hallucinate any confirmation desired and be convincing while doing it.