this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
953 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

18625 readers
917 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In August 2025, two nearly identical lawsuits were filed: one against United (in San Francisco federal court) and one against Delta Air Lines (in Brooklyn federal court). They claim that each airline sold more than one million “window seats” on aircraft such as the Boeing 737, Boeing 757, and Airbus A321, many of which are next to blank fuselage walls rather than windows.

Passengers say they paid seat-selection fees (commonly $30 to $100+) expecting a view, sunlight, or the comfort of a genuine window seat — and say they would not have booked or paid extra had they known the seat lacked a window.

As reported by Reuters, United’s filing argues that it never promised a view when it used the label “window” for a seat. According to the airline, “window” refers only to the seat’s location next to the aircraft wall, not a guarantee of an exterior view.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Next there won't be a seat, the term "seat" just means the place you stand for the whole trip

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If airlines could get away with stacking people in there like a transatlantic slave ship they would do it.

As a mildly tall person, not even exceptionally tall, flying as it is already is borderline painful. The seat space is not built for anyone who isnt pint sized

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a a 5’11” person, yeah it’s painful to fly.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Just imagine if you were 6ft! The horror!

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I saw a plan years ago that was basically that. 'seats' were planks leaned back at a ~°70 angle, reducing space in between to like 1 foot per person.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

You know I wouldn't mind flat bunks though, like stack 3 high. You have a table time to go sit and eat and have a coffee then back to the bunk.