Based on the description on their site, the controller includes a built-in battery: "8.39 Wh Li-ion battery, 35+ hours of gameplay... "
That was disappointing for me. Specially condidering the Steam Frame's controllers make use of AA batteries: "One replaceable AA battery per controller, 40hr battery life"
AA Batteries might not be as convenient to use, but being able to replace them is a great advantage. All my Xbox360 controllers still work fine, but none of my PS3' Dualshock 3s.
The official docking station could be used to recharge (rechargables) AA batteries so the functionality could remain the same.
Ok, and you'll only have to swap this battery out after a couple of years, so what's the problem?
Glad we're agreed it's about the access, not the battery itself.
I have had discussions with this person before and it's not worth it haha. It doesn't matter that this person will spend arguably more time swapping AA batteries over the years than the time spent replacing the built in batter one or two times during its lifetime.
I've already said what the problem is, several times now. I'm not repeating myself. Scroll up and read.
No, it's both.
The problem as you've stated it compares replacing an AA battery (necessary very often) to replacing a rechargeable battery (only necessary when it's health depletes after years), so your characterisation of it so far is unreasonable, which is why I asked again.
If it's both you've failed to explain any inherent problem with non-AA batteries when it comes to the time taken to change them. I can change a the custom battery in my camera as quickly as any AA. Faster, even, than the typical AA sprung enclosure because of the housing.
Incorrect. I replace them when they need charging. Pop the ones in the controller out, pop them on the charger, and pop freshly-charged ones in. 5 seconds.
That is obviously not the case with the Steam controller.
you now need to buy special batteries from a particular source that likely won't even be available for purchase 5-10 years on. Whereas AA are ubiquitous and can buy them from hundreds of vendors, and likely will be able to indefinitely.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean I've "failed to explain" it. I've explained it over and over at this point.
Why is 5 seconds every few days better than 2 minutes every few years? You just keep talking up how easy it is to replace AAs as if that's somehow the only important thing? For it to be worse, it has to be worse than the alternative which you just don't seem to understand is going to take up less time?
How do you know? Do you have a preview?
But you've again completely ignored the point, which is that the non-AA alternative is quicker to swap, so the time to swap was never about the battery type, was it?
Once you've understood this we can talk about the point you never initially mentioned, but I'm not opening a new discussion when you're being so willfully ignorant on the first one.
I'm not answering the same questions yet again. Goodbye.
Why do you need to replace the battery after only a few minutes of use? Did you miss that you recharge it in the controller?
You only need to replace it when it no longer holds enough charge to be useful, which is going to be at least a couple of years. You're not replacing the battery in your phone every couple of days, are you? Why would this battery be different?
Your edit:
I did not ask any questions in my last comment that I had asked before. You have never said why you think you need to replace the battery in the controller often enough for a screwed-down battery cover to be a problem. You have never said why the battery not being AA-sized makes it take longer to replace, when there are many quickly-swappable battery designs out there.
You have tried to say that the Steam Controller won't be like that - but without evidence and without acknowledging that you said something wrong. That's not very good.