599
Tucker Carlson: Trump Shooter Was a Trump-Backing Radical — and the FBI Covered It Up
(www.mediaite.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
599 points (98.9% liked)
politics
26404 readers
2832 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wait a second, did Tucker actually do a journalism this time? Or is this just a craven "see I go after both sides" play?
I don't think he plays for either side. He's an opportunist who was spurned by one side. Now his opportunities lie elsewhere and he's exploiting them thoroughly.
If I had to guess, his hope is likely to do enough damage to become the better devil they know.
Everyone knows you can make more money from swindling the right than the left.
He has a side, it's Vladimir Putin's side. His clips are aired regularly on Russian media, and he "interviewed" Putin in Moscow last year by tossing him a bunch of softball questions.
So...a poster child of journalism. Not activism kind of journalism, just journalism. Feast on the weak, no matter who they are.
Wasn't he the one that did that damning 'gotcha' interview with Pedonald on Fox News a while ago, where it was revealed he'd taken a bunch of confidential files from the White House after his first term?
I feel like he flip-flopped on him a while ago, but maybe you're right.