this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
524 points (96.5% liked)
Not The Onion
18625 readers
1250 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those could both be true. People feel like they need $125k more to be secure, but when they get it, it doesn't make them as happy as they thought it would. They need another $25k more to feel that way.
the issue is they get that extra $125K. And then the start spending 95% of it on shit they weren't buying before. They don't get the extra 125K and not spend it.
It's called lifestyle creep.
The 'poorest' people I've ever met were often part of the 300K+ club. Most of my friends making 100K or under aren't the ones whining about how poor they are. It's the people who are buying designer clothes and luxury cars.
so many people I meet are making like 100-150K a year. but they are spending way about their means on luxuries they don't need but feel are 'necessary'. like dropping $500 each weekend going out, which is $2000 a the end of the month. gym memberships, travel, luxury apartments, designer clothes, etc.
I mean that really isn't the issue. If they actually do that they are doing exactly what trickle down economics says.
The issue is that in reality people don't so that - they save a lot of that extra cash for a cushy retirement, and then work less.