this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
682 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

18606 readers
1848 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
kescusay@lemmy.world
682
Trump admits he didn’t have to tear down East Wing for ballroom, but just wanted to (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 day ago by io@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-melania-upset-east-wing-demolition-b2862932.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If only truth was so easy to dismiss so we can follow our own selfish desires...

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

truth

If your definition of truth includes religious texts in any capacity other than, perhaps, a very dated take on philosophy, then that’s a point we are simply not going to agree on.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

What do you mean by "dated take" - does right or wrong change with time?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Yes it does. The bounds of what society considers acceptable or reprehensible changes with time, location, and culture.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 11 hours ago

So if morality is subjective, then who are we to judge the holocaust? It was acceptable in that time, location and culture.

[–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What would you say: is buying slaves from the nations that surround me still right, did god instruct people to do wrong or did right and wrong change?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

God never instructed people to buy slaves. Concessions were once made to an adulterous nation because of their hardened hearts.

[–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

If you want to say that god made concessions to man go ahead. He still instructed them in how to hold chattel slaves and implied that they could do so ruthlessly, only restricting them from doing so to eachother.

Leviticus 25:44-46

44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The morals of the Abrahamic Religions are the morals of blood-thirsty totalitarian pedophiles.