this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
291 points (91.9% liked)
Greentext
7345 readers
898 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
BMI is also a bad measure of health. It only roughly estimates how statistically unhealthy someone would be if they were an american in the middle 20th Century. Bodies can be healthy at any size. Exercise helps.
That's true to a point. Extra fat based weight is harmful that's just a medical fact.
How much is too much for a specific individual can be somewhat variable, and body composition matters.
BMI as a tool can be clunky and not ideal at times, but if you're more than 1 point off the healthy range and you're not a body builder your health will be impacted (over time).
I'm overweight myself, but I don't try to convince myself I'm in peak condition.
What's crazy to me is that sumo wrestlers aren't actually fat, they eat and exercise in a certain way that the fat only builds up on the outside, not in their heart or anything that would cause health problems. So it's more accurate to say they have fat but are incredibly healthy.
For country-level data, there is nothing wrong with BMI. There is at best a low single digit percentage of the population who is athletic enough that they're BMI-overweight without actually being fat.
BMI isn't perfect but it's still a good tool to compare two large, similar populations.
And no, being morbidly obese is not healthy.