this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
608 points (99.0% liked)

RetroGaming

25664 readers
459 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Sure but the switch 2 has a rechargeable battery unlike the game gear which had to be supplied with new batteries every time which cost money.

I’m not sure if rechargeable AA were common in those days.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Rechargeable batteries were common, but in my experience they tended to not hold up as long as normal batteries and took 6-8 hours to recharge. At that time they also degraded quickly, were expensive, and overall just a massive hassle to try and manage.

The IBM thinkpad that runs on windows 95 that I have still has a vaguely functional battery. The battery can last a whole 5 minutes still, damned battery was probably more expensive to produce than the entire rest of the laptop.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

rechargable AA's before Eneloops were all absolute dogshit

[–] fancy-straw-simple@piefed.ca 7 points 6 days ago

The biggest problem with rechargeable dry cells is that each one supports 1.2 volts, while alkaline are 1.5. Some devices wouldn't even run, most run more poorly and run out of battery even faster.