this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
278 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26427 readers
2480 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The nonpartisan nonprofit Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget released cost projections after Trump pitched his idea this weekend.

Donald Trump's proposal to send Americans $2,000 rebate checks from money collected through his tariffs is projected to cost $600 billion a year ‒ about double what the United States is expected to generate from the new duties on imports.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan nonprofit that studies fiscal policy, released the projections on Nov. 10 after Trump over the weekend pitched his idea on Truth Social. The president touted "taking in Trillions of Dollars" and said, "A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not sure if this is his exact motive or not, but its pretty obvious that this would buy back some good will he's lost with some of his followers or people who don't pay attention to politics. People get angry, then get a check and then calm down a bit. For where I live, a $2000 check would maybe cover most of rent for a low-mid range 1 bedroom apartment for a month, but that's it.

For other people in the country, presumably where more of his followers live, that could be like 3 months of rent. Its also not his personal money he'd be losing, its ours. He's just forcing the public to spend their own tax money on a Band-Aid for his terrible economic policies, while it hilariously gets taxed again in the form of 'income' for each individual.

[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a reasonable argument I largely hadn't considered because I genuinely hadn't considered he cares whether he has goodwill, or would even accept he had lost it anyway. But if he does, and he has, you could well be right.

I think this is just another 5000 check from doge though.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who knows. He claimed he paused tarrifs in the beginning because people were getting 'yippy' (lmao what kind of dismissive, out of touch fucking asshole says that?), so he could just be tired of hearing about poor people's troubles and thinks this will shut everyone up.