this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
207 points (94.4% liked)

World News

50687 readers
3400 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Online pornography showing strangulation or suffocation is to be made illegal, as part of government plans to tackle violence against women and girls.

It follows a review which found depictions of choking were "rife" on mainstream porn sites and had helped normalise the act among young people.

Both the possession and publication of such material will be a criminal offence, under amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill currently going through Parliament.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That article only cites deaths due to autoerotic asphyxiation, which I haven't seen or heard portrayed in porn, and says that are mostly men, which contradicts the stated objective of preventing harm to women. Have you even read the source you linked or the article, mate?

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 0 points 10 hours ago

No, it mentions both, "mate." Just because you like that act doesn't mean the concerns are warrantless/unjustified, and if you were truly objectively thinking about it then you wouldn't be denying that fact.

I'm done arguing this. We've both said our pieces. Just because I'm not an expert ready and armed with documented facts doesn't mean I don't have a valid point. You don't like it, TFB - go argue it with the lawmakers because I'm done with this childishness.