this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
81 points (97.6% liked)

World News

50860 readers
1828 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I would support having links to "the controversy" on that page, except those "controversy" pages are going to be filled with lies, which don't belong on Wikipedia. Maybe a page of links to not-wikipedia sources so that people can easily judge the info by its source? You know who would be a good group to make this call? The Wikipedia editors

The Wikipedia editors know what they're doing, I trust them more than a guy who said things under pressure in a rigged interview, even if he is the founder.