this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
138 points (99.3% liked)
Linux
10022 readers
485 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Unless Wayland adds all feature X11 has, it's not a worthy replacement.
Counterpoint: X11 wasn't designed with today's security needs in mind, and developers were building based on the assumptions that those security holes would remain. We don't actually want everything that X11 had, we only want the good bits.
Or to put it another way, the switch from X11 to Wayland = https://xkcd.com/1172/
Well I would define "features" as "the good bits" and not as "security holes". ;)
X11 has a shitload of unwanted and unused features that your favorite X11 compositor is actively fighting AGAINST to render your GUI.
I implore you to pick up the X.Org source code and your favorite X11 shitshow's source code and realize why Wayland follows the same paradigms that apple adopted in 2001 and Microsoft in 2006.