this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
1695 points (99.8% liked)

politics

26268 readers
4627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zohran Mamdani has won the race for New York City mayor, according to Decision Desk HQ, ushering in a new era of progressive politics in the city and reigniting the debate over the Democratic Party’s future.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist, is poised to become the first millennial and first Muslim to lead New York City, after a campaign that pulled off one of the most stunning political upsets in recent memory. He defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who mounted a long-shot independent bid after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in his bid to succeed Mayor Eric Adams.

Mamdani focused heavily on affordability, pledging to freeze rent, establish city-owned grocery stores and make buses free for riders. He quickly became a progressive icon as well as a polarizing figure within the party over his positions, so much so that it divided prominent New York Democratic leadership over whether to endorse him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

My mother, the only family that I have left that I will talk to sent me a text asking if any other cities will have a "radical Islamist" mayor. I ignored it because I could not find the words to explain that what she described isn't a thing without destroying the one connection to my family I have left.

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 27 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"You really will believe anything they tell you"

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Has 24-hour TV news cycle running in the background during phone calls

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

By their own admission, they're "entertainment".

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

“radical Islamist”

Lol "radical islamist" who supports LGBT rights?

(actual "radical islamists" would be anti LGBT)

[–] bier@feddit.nl 6 points 18 hours ago

Yes just like radical Christians, radical Muslims don't like anything gay, female etc. There is a reason in some Middle Eastern countries women can't go outside without a man "protecting" them.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

And attends pub crawls.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Oh the right wing have a response to that. Its a Muslim tactic called Takia, apparently. You deceive and manipulate people to push your sharia agenda or something. PBDs friends were coping about it:

40 mins in

(My spouse is a professor so the full spectrum of media gets played. Some of its awful, sometimes I feel my brain leaking out of my ears)

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

He's a "radical, Muslim" not a "radical muslim" :D

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

I’m so sorry about that.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 18 hours ago

It's always strange to me whenever I hear people describe their relationships with their family members the way you would describe an ongoing argument with a troll baiting you in a youtube comments' section.

I mean... she sent that to you apropos of nothing? Not even "How are the kids/How's your job"? Just to get a reaction out of you?

I don't understand modern-day American nuclear "family" dynamics at all...

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

That's fucked up and sad. But maybe try to engage in an educated discussion to change her mind?

If a TV was able to "educate" her on what "radical islamist" is, surely a daughter should be able to convince own mother, with educated facts, on what it isn't.

Shutting down discussions like this lets propaganda win and spread.

Your mom is gonna spread that shit to all her contacts, but if you put at least a small doubt in her mind, she might decide to keep it to herself at least.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

Fucking bitch.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Drop that nazi bitch and find a better family.

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

Sometimes in the real world, there's this thing we have to exercise called "nuance." She is 85 with heavy dementia and has nothing to do but watch TV in the nursing home. No, I won't drop the only person that still gives a shit about me because her mind is mostly gone and is stressed that she is being told that she won't have anywhere to live in a month. I'm going to be in that situation myself in a couple weeks.