this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
850 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

9763 readers
3116 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 114 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, this is arguably the most significant thing for America for the night. Countering Texas’ Gerrymander is big, but it’s not as sexy of a story.

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 40 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I agree, that is also very important. But I still think that getting rid of Pelosi and the other ghouls in the DNC would/could be the most important thing right now. The Democratic Party desperately needs a renewal, a progressive reform and to embrace real left-wing, socialist politics to save the middle class from sliding down and help poor people to break out - as opposed to give in to every wish and whim of billionaire oligarchs who are stealing literally all wealth from the rest of society.

The whole 'let's follow the republicans further and further to the right to grab the centrist's votes' idea clearly is not working. It is not making peoples' lives better (except for the oligarchs). And it is not even helping democrats win elections and secure power any more.

Appeasement didn't work against the nazis, why would it work against MAGA?

But unfortunately Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries and the rest of these cronies are all absolutely hellbent on keeping up with the appeasement. They all need to retire or get primaried, or the US is lost to fascism for who knows how many decades.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 38 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The way I always put it, moving left may not win us elections (and those imagining a quiet leftist supermajority need to talk to more normies), but sure as shit it's been proven that neither will moving right.

Moving left will improve the country, while moving right will make it worse.

Ceteris paribus, the choice should be obvious: moving left isn't a panacea for our electoral problems, but it is still very much the preferable choice. Caution may be called for on specific issues, but in general, the American electorate is not very ideological in any coherent sense. 'Left' and 'right' are feelings for them, and they'll side with whichever 'sounds good' at a given moment.

Let's purge the Dems of these ancient neoliberal ghouls and move fucking left. I'm so fucking tired. If we still lose, at least this time we'll lose with a little basic fucking dignity. Which isn't much, but still a hell of a lot better than selling out and losing anyway.

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

I find it very interesting that it was put up to a vote in California. In Texas, the legislators just took it upon themselves to cheat. "Going high" is going to bite the dems in the ass eventually, though.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Texas doesn’t allow for citizens to gather signatures to put something directly on the ballot. The politicians control everything.

CA citizens used a citizen-led ballot initiative to take the redistricting keys away from the legislature. Stuff like this has to go before voters in CA.

The people are more in control in CA.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Texas has gone so far right, they might as well be 100% in control of every thing a person does at this point.

Every prop appears to have passed yesterday, and only a few are good ideas.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Going high", in this case referring to using democratic principles to govern? That's not going high, that's how the system is supposed to work.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Things are so bad that 'not cheating' is taking the high road, yeah

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No, they are cheating, just with the blessing of the public. Like gerrymandering isn't a thing you should be able to do, fullstop, but it isn't something normally possible to do in California.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Working within a broken system isn't cheating though. Cheating means you're breaking the rules.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, there's a California rule that states that redistricting is done by a non-partisan commission. This explicitly sidesteps that process. They're breaking a rule with permission but they're still breaking a rule.

If your DM rules that you can have two actions in a turn without reason, it's still cheating.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I'd argue this is explicitly not cheating. Revising the rules though a democratic process IS democracy.

The D&D example is closer since it doesn't explicitly call for buy-in from the whole table, but the first and only rule of D&D is to have fun with the DM being chief facilitator. The PHB and DMG are just suggestions. If this favoritism caused others in the party to feel slighted, then it would be 'cheating'.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It HAD to go before a vote in Cali. We didn’t have a choice politically since our independent election map commission is enshrined into the state constitution. In Texas they don’t have anything remotely enshrined into their constitution so for us here in Cali we had to put it to the people and even then it’s sorta weak since it has an exact end date in 2030. It’s only here for one cycle before it falls off and goes back. Which could be dangerous if the other states don’t stop gerrymandering.

That or we’ll just leave next time.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

It's preferable that it has an end date since it's intentionally cheating the system for the greater good. I'd rather have it keep going up for a vote every 5 years so we can choose to put it back as needed.