Linux

10016 readers

634 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Snap out of it: Canonical on Flatpak friction, Core Desktop, and the future of Ubuntu (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ubuntu Summit The Register FOSS desk sat down with Canonical's vice-president for engineering, Jon Seager, during Ubuntu Summit earlier this month. This is a heavily condensed version of our conversation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Snap absolutely matters in server deployments FYI. Its advantages are pretty clear in that space, and arguably more suited to it.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago

The only reason I can think of to use a Snap is that you're using Ubuntu, and some package you expected to be available through apt is now only available as a Snap. The better solution is to not use Ubuntu, and rely on Docker or Podman to get anything not available as a system package.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh, that's interesting. And from what I know about Flatpak, I can see issues there.

...If snap (and base Ubuntu) basically diverge to, and specialize in, server usage, that seems fine.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago

They do? Why?