this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
775 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

8468 readers
1931 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can pretty much always do make.

Model for fun cars but not boring ones/trucks/vans/suvs.

Year for the outstanding exemplary best model years of the fun ones.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any more, cars change very little between years. Sometimes hard to tell even after a "refresh" in the middle of a generation. My kid thinks it's a superpower that I can tell the differences between generations of Corvettes. Like dude, I've had car magazines in my hands since I was half your age.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah for a lot of cars (such as my own Audi a3 sportback), I'd only be able to give you a fairly wide range of years because whatever changes there were are more or less imperceptible.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Which is totally understandable, really. It makes no sense to retool every single year to make small adjustments like the 50's and 60's. That being said ford made several "generations" of mustang without ever changing the frame. I think of the last 3 full redesigns, they've all shared 2 generations of architecture. That's too long to go without updating the core of the car.