this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
493 points (97.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

38021 readers
702 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Booleans. Change the year to 2020, or remove certain sites/results.

All the data is still there, just gotta know how to find it, kinda like an old school library at this point! If you’re going through the process of self learning and/or bettering yourself instead of just watching and repeating, you’ll know how to wade through crap already. And if you want the latter, well googles crapification isn’t a concern to you.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Google hasn't used most booleans for like a decade

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

https://booleanstrings.com/2022/11/04/boolean-search-is-dead/

Boolean operators influence your search results, but are not strictly respected the way you would expect them to be

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

restaurant manager -manager

That shouldn’t turn up no results. That poster is assuming A LOT. It also looked like a blog post and is 30% ads, what kind of source is that? The link provided by Schmidt shows that most Booleans do work on Google and is newer than your posted link as well, as well as provided by one of their engineers… so they should be taken as more knowledgeable then… a blog post to from a random person.

Because the search will turn up results that aren’t related to managers, there will absolutely be results. The only people who would assume there would be no results are people who think search engines only return proper results, and incorrectly assume Boolean are true AND, OR and NOT. When they have never been.

The issue in case you haven’t figured it out, is assuming how stuff should work and being ignorant instead of learning.

Most Booleans work on Google and have existed for decades, claiming they “don’t” or “don’t work” just means you don’t understand what the point of them has always been.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Who claimed they were? They are tools to help, they have never included all Booleans and they’ve changed over time, my link from a Google engineer even specifies that. They have never meant to be restrictive like AND, OR and NOT, where do you get this idea from?Your website is cancer FYI.

Use :before, and you’ll get no results past that time.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't help for things that are relatively new.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There is plenty of different Booleans for those situations, but there’s not many new inventions in the last 5 years.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is in bikes.

I didn't really want to get into details of the particular thing that prompted this post, because then there's going to be too many people posting suggestions they think are helpful, and that would be missing the point. Suffice it to say that I'm cobbling together pieces from YouTube, forum posts, and old Reddit threads that, IMO, I would expect to see more consolidated. In times past, I think it would be. I do think I'll get there in the end, but it feels much harder to get everything together than it used to be.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Other than more brands and types of e-bikes? Most have existed for quite a while, just not at a consumer level.

And e-bikes are just circuits, or otherwise proprietary components. You’re gonna be following manufacturer guides, or likely videos, so use site results to specify.