this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
39 points (95.3% liked)

Canada

10607 readers
560 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Isn't that already the case though? Aren't hospitals and schools mostly public except for a few private ones?

Maybe make them ALL public and forbid any private for-profit health care and education facilities. This will force the more priviledged to invest in that system if they want the best service for themselves and their children.

Didn't some Scandinavian country do this already?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between hospitals being public and health care services being public. Drugs for chronic conditions. Dentistry. Optometry. Psychiatric services. Proper handling of transport costs for people not living in large cities who urgently need to see a specialist (Ontario's reimbursement program for that is joke-worthy). Hospital equipment—constant fundraisers to replace things should not be required. There's so much stuff that falls between the cracks under the current setup that really should be covered by the government.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Aaah OK I see your point. And, yes, I agree with you there.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

schools mostly public except for a few private ones?

About those exceptions...

Public money shouldn't be going to private schools.

If you want your kid to be in some elitist private school, you should pay the entire cost. Otherwise the public system is always an option.

Diverting public funds away from the public education system just weakens the public system.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's what I was trying to say about some Scandinavian country.

In Finland it is forbidden to have private schools. All education is public. So if some rich family want what's best for their kids, they'll have to invest in the system like everybody else.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How I read the question is what should be nationalised, not what else should be.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

You are right.