this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
309 points (98.1% liked)

politics

26256 readers
4145 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

You're right that Christianity is exclusionary at the institutional level. Its a part of why the church has generally lost favor in society over time (in addition to rationalism etc.)

But individual Christians can be accommodating so in a universe where JD Vance isn't trying to turn the US into a white nationalist "utopia" it could work.

One of the core tenets of Christianity is that the only path to salvation is through Christ. That means non Christians are going to hell. That must be hard to accept (that your spouse cannot be heaven bound) but I think many Christians individually try not to think about this too much as they meet good non Christian people while living in pluralistic societies.

There are theological frameworks within Catholicism that seek to be more inclusive (implicit faith, anonymous Christians) but they are not widely accepted within Christianity (or even within Catholicism for that matter).

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

One of the core tenets of Christianity is that the only path to salvation is through Christ. That means non Christians are going to hell.

This isn't universally true (and is often a byproduct of most people thinking that the claims of Evangelicals are true; to be fair, it's in part because they're so loud and won't shut up).

Catholicism believes it's very well possible for non-Christians to go to Heaven (JD Vance, I'm sure, doesn't but there's a reason he's had to've been corrected by the Vatican multiple times).

[–] mobotsar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

+1 for "to've". It's a good word.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You're absolutely right I was able to find this 2021 data from Pew:

collapsed inline media1000040432

Catholics are twice as likely as Protestants to say that people who do not believe in God can still go to heaven (68% vs. 34%). Evangelical Protestants are especially likely to view access to heaven as exclusive in this regard, with 71% saying that only those who believe in God can go to heaven, compared with 21% who say nonbelievers can gain entry, while most mainline Protestants (56%) say that people who do not believe in God can go to heaven.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Its certainly more than just Evangelicals and even within Catholicism there isn't broad agreement (even though it is more open to the idea of implicit faith).

In Catholic teaching, the Catechism (1260‑1261) leaves room for “invincible ignorance,” meaning that people who never hear the Gospel through no fault of their own may still be saved. Past papal statements (e.g., John Paul II’s Redemptor Hominis, Benedict XVI’s Dominus Iesus) reinforce this inclusive possibility, even while affirming that baptism and conscious assent remain the ordinary means of salvation. Surveys of Western Catholics show some acceptance of this view: a 2015 Pew Research Center poll of U.S. adults found that roughly 38 % of self‑identified Catholics agreed that “people of other religions can go to heaven.” Similar European Catholic surveys report figures ranging from 30 % to 45 %, indicating a sizable minority that embraces an inclusive outlook.

Among Protestants, the dominant doctrine of sola fide (faith alone) stresses that personal trust in Christ is the exclusive gateway to eternal life. While some Reformed or liberal evangelical circles entertain concepts like “anonymous Christians” or God’s mysterious mercy, these ideas are not mainstream. Pew’s 2014 study of U.S. Protestants showed that only about 15 % endorsed the statement that “people of other religions can go to heaven,” with higher agreement among mainline denominations (≈20 %) and lower among evangelical/conservative groups (≈10 %).

Generally speaking its a minority of Christians that believe non Christians can go to heaven, especially among Protestants.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not using poll data from over a decade ago may help with that: https://www.pewresearch.org/. PEW's 2021 study found that 34% of Protestants believed only those who believed would go to Heaven though that's largely due to 21% of Evangelicals and 31% of historically black churches: 56% of Mainline Protestants believe people who don't believe can go Heaven.

And what individual Catholics believe doesn't matter because Catholics aren't Protestants; the Magisterium of the Church teaches – multiple times, stretching back to at least the beginning of the last century – that those who don't believe are capable of going to Heaven. Anyone can believe otherwise but that's, definitionally, not a Catholic belief (though, for the sake of completeness, it's 68% of individual Catholics who believe non-believers can go to Heaven, as of 2021).

Again, there's no way you can say this is true universally and, for neither Catholics nor Mainline Protestants, it's not a minority who believe it.

EDIT: this would be the second time, in the last 2 days, someone provided updated information that I didn't see because I was in the middle of writing a reply; looks like you found the same source as I had

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yes. I've run across many tolerant xtians (many in my own family) during my life and you are not wrong.

Now I know that some xtians would definitely say other xtians are not "real" xtians unless they believe certain things, but there are definitely xtian denominations that don't think the only way to salvation is through Jesus, so it's not just down to individuals.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Catholicism disagrees with that though! In Catholicism christ is necessary for salvation, and accepting him is the only revealed path to salvation but there is reasonable hope for the salvation of non-believers. That's why pope Francis was comfortable saying that he hopes hell is empty. The hope that through good works and changes in purgatory all people can be saved.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

You're absolutely right! I was surprised to learn two in three Catholics believe non Christians can go to heaven (see the link to 2021 Pew data in my other reply).