this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
739 points (97.2% liked)

Uplifting News

16980 readers
48 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Renorc@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Great! But this doesn’t mention cost. Another biopolymer doesn’t matter at all unless it is cheaper than petroleum based polymers. In the end high volume consumer products are extremely price sensitive.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The petrochemical industry has significant economies of scale, making it difficult to dethrone. Also, there are some shady political shenanigans to ensure its continued existence. Getting rid of oil is going to require some radical changes.

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Getting rid of oil would also require radical breakthroughs in solvents. I doubt oil is going anywhere even if ICEs and plastics stopped being used.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing is, oil is an incredible resource with properties unlike any other, so we should stop fucking burning it

If all we we use oil for is solvents and lubrication and such, it would probably be perfectly fine, and we would have enough for centuries.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

We should also stop using it for food packaging. I don't need the thing that is covering my vegetables to last for hundreds of years.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If we stopped making power and transportation from burning oil and gas that would be a huge improvement. It's usage as a solevent or other applications is negligible.

Get rid of the plastics on top of that and we might actually have a chance

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

On top of that, the rest of chemical industry is largely dependent on oil, with oil-based products literally everywhere. Even asphalt and bitumen used in road construction comes from crude oil. Lubricants, dyes, detergents, waxes and emulsifiers are also derived from oil, just to name a few.

Even when we develop clever new methods to manufacture all of these products from plant-based materials, the logistics chain to manage the volumes required by modern life is not there yet. Building this infrastructure will take a long time, just like it took decades to create the addiction we’re currently in.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Plastics were a luxury good 100 years ago. How much is petroleum distillation subsidized currently? That contributes to the cheapness of plastic. China has demonstrated that doing things for the people's benefit is worth their time instead of focusing on endless profit.

If Chinese companies start using bamboo plastic for disposable packaging it'll make more of an impact than you repeating oil oligarch propaganda

[–] Renorc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I’m not a propagandist, I’m an engineer who designs consumer products. As an environmentalist I actively campaigned my last employer in support of bio plastic options. However in over 30 years I have never been able to specify a single part made from bio plastic due to either material properties and/or the cost of raw resin. Like I said, good for the Chinese. But in America corporate greed rules.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's no propaganda in that post. Unless forced by consumer demand or the government companies will not switch to a more expensive packaging. They're about quarterly profits, that's it.

Additionally, there are some oil applications we don't have a replacement for, however we have replacements for pretty much all the largest polluters (energy, transport, and plastic).

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

China has demonstrated that doing things for the people's benefit is worth their time instead of focusing on endless profit.

Propaganda deepthroating level: all porn actresses are envious.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

@Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone said:

  • Cost analysis presented it at 2.3k usd per ton, with the cheapest plastic (HIPS) at 1.3k/t and the most expensive (PLA) at 2.6k/t. Though the cost analysis didn't show all the plastics it used for material comparison.