this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
485 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26234 readers
2702 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive link: https://archive.is/hk7Bw

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I think what’s he’s getting confused about is that they’re using electromagnets, which the circuitry of could certainly be damaged by water.

I suspect someone at some point communicated some kind of potential problem the navy could be having, and he just went “magnets + water = bad, got it”. Which is what I think the real point should be here. It’s not so much that the president is confused about how magnets work, its more that someone at some point mentioned some kind of existing or potential situation and he is just spewing it back out without really understanding it.

Like basically the president of the fucking United States is not capable of understanding someone telling him that electromagnets can be damaged by water and/or is unable to communicate that basic concept.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 47 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Never mind every other fucking electronic thing on a modern aircraft carrier.

Nobody tell him that fighter jets sink in the water, he'll have all the carriers decommissioned because "Planes don't go on water. Why are we sending airplanes into the ocean, they'll just sink!"

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well, to be fair, we do seem to be doing that a lot

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

One of those was a helicopter, which in fairness, also does not go on water.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah, see, you don't need to worry about planes sinking in the water if you don't take them out in the water. Melt all the carriers down and make shitty branded watches out of them to sell to dopes for way too much money.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Hey - ask him about windmills

Or the big faucet in the mountains.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

or batteries and sharks and boats.