this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50581 readers
4578 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51884177

The company's Chinese arm has taken steps toward independence and has resumed selling products to domestic Chinese customers.

The sources said the Dutch government believes it can negotiate a resolution with China that will restore the company to a unified Dutch-Chinese structure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Would any excuse be valid if China nationalised European companies? 😑

[–] sprack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Like they effectively did with ARM?

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not like China hasn't had protectionist policies. Why do you think they don't let google/etc. operate within the country.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't feel like those two things are the same.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That's fair, but expect to see even more of this in the future.

China historically has done a lot to protect their domestic industries (blocking access to the country, currency manipulation to keep prices cheap, required state involvement, etc.). That's not to say other countries haven't (US with Bailouts and Itar, etc.).

However, I would expect to see more of this across the world as globalization takes a bit of a hit. Both from rising tensions, but also from some of the fragility in supply chains exposed due to the pandemic.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

So banning foreign companies entirely is more ethical than letting them compete and nationalising them when they fail or become too greater risk?

Makes perfect sense!