this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
836 points (98.2% liked)

Work Reform

14107 readers
1643 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] elderorb@feddit.nl 39 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Does anyone have a link to the actual study? The article doesn't seem to have it.

[–] NycterVyvver@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

I'm having a tough time finding it. I found this citation from an article that appeared to reference the same four year study.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0248008

[–] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What? You don't automatically trust "The Editorial Team's" assertion at the bottom that "This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies" is valid? I mean they linked to a few other articles - the fact they're only ones on their own site shouldn't matter...

🙄 "Trust me, bro!"

[–] NycterVyvver@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wearing A Shirt

And nothing else!

[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm a researcher in the field that studies stuff like this and it's infuriating that there is no citation for this. I can probably find it but it's just horrible "journalism" to have no citation to the subject of your article.

[–] zipkag@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I haven't looked extensively, but for the past ten minutes I've not been able to find any article. About 20 different news stories to say the same thing, but none of them actually link a peer reviewed published article.

[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

When you have to conduct a literature review just to find the results of one study there is something deeply wrong