this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
206 points (87.1% liked)

politics

26226 readers
6617 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm terminally online and just thought it was a funny looking skull until this article. It's not distinct like it's a hammer and sickle or a laser shooting kiwi. It's a skull and crossbones and there's probably 100 combinations of those and only this one with the Nazi roots.
It doesn't seem like something unreasonable.
It does seem like a well funded smear campaign.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So... back in 2020 he knew it was a totenkopf and had a lineage to the SS but figured it was just funny looking?

Something is definitely getting smeared alright.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The article just said reddit acct talked about ss lightning. Not that skull and bones symbol. Or am I wrong,

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You are wrong

https://web.archive.org/web/20190226141422/https:/www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/auy0bi/battleweary_ss/ is one of the threads. He is specifically replying to someone talking about the military's use of skulls and nazi imagery by insisting it is actually a punisher skull.

At BEST you are arguing that he has immensely poor judgment, zero reading comprehension, and suckles on propaganda from the teat without a moment's thoughts. Which is not leadership material.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mean this skull? That looks nothing like the actual skull in question? And that apparently was being used by military and police?
https://www.inverse.com/article/39633-marvel-netflix-punisher-skull-meaning-cops-soldiers

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, I mean this skull (no idea on the legitimacy of that site but most mainstream outlets apparently don't want a picture of a nazi in his tighty brownies on the front page) https://themainemonitor.org/platner-tattoo-nazi-totenkopf/

Or is the point you are trying to make is that he saw a discussion of people talking about how many people in the military have fucking SS skulls everywhere (including as battalion flags and the like), looked down at his chest, and then insisted on defending a completely unrelated symbol?