politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It wasn't even a filibuster?
He just started talking at 6pm, and kept talking for almost a day?
What was the point?
https://gov.mtopgroup.com/art1/floor-senate
There wasn't even anything scheduled to happen today...
This performative "raising awareness" isn't helping, especially if you schedule everything with the fascists before hand
Edit:
Can any of the trained seals who clap whenever asked at least tell me what the point of starting at 6pm and doing like 14-16 hours when no one was even there?
Without even knowing what he spoke about yet, which I don't, I can respect the conviction of a person who uses their platform to speak when they have rare access to that platform and there's plenty to talk about.
Plenty of us are going on marathon posting sessions on social media and it's to a much smaller audience. I have to empathize a little bit with anybody who feels exhausted or overwhelmed by the absurdity of everything but then gets up to speak for a whole damn day on one of the largest stages in the world
Even if the room is empty the audience is global. It may be grandstanding, but that's part of the job. Getting attention to things you care about is part of the job. People put you there to bring attention to things that they hope that you care about.
If government's going to work at all people have to give a shit about it and whatever this dude was talking about it's clear he gives a shit about it.
I didn't think of that either...
People acknowledgeing how little this did, have to acknowledge they're also not really "fighting the power" themselves.
Good point.
Some will show up and do things only because they feel the support is out there to act and be seen.
I might make different efforts were I them, but they are at least paddling in the same direction I want to go. I just don't have the energy to resent how they choose to spend their outrage.
If your house is burning down, your kids and dog are trapped inside...
You barely make it out alive, but you know your family is in there...
Firefighters show up, a wave of relief washes over....
Then they sit down and pray to Jesus that someone comes to put out the fire.
If you got upset the people paid to put out fires aren't using the equipment or putting any real effort into saving your family who are actively burning to death, and you yell at the firefighters:
How would you react to someone telling you the firefighters are doing all they can?
"The record". Posterity. It makes the entire thing part of the History of Government. Otherwise, it's just external reports and heresay. This paves the road for official acts like secession. Think of it like HR filing a formal disciplinary action. Until they do, the paper trail isn't there. "See? We warned you."
As I see it. I'm no politics wonk.
The French process: go to the tennis court, and politic without the king's permission.
But there are official means to do that type of stuff.
This was not that...
I don't even know if a transcript will be kept, especially since the first 12+ hours was overnight
I think this is the real explanation...
People just don't know what can be done, so they get excited for stupid meaningless shit. And don't demand for productive things instead.
Just clapping for bread and circus like it's 1788
Someone on the Democratic side stands up and does something within their power to go against the Republican party, and you're criticizing them for not doing it during session?
This is something. It's not a game changer, but it's better than nothing.
Why are you upset that this took place? It's a positive thing. Are you upset that the no kings protest took place while there wasn't something more significant happening at the same time as well?
Because they're either trained to shit on democrats at every single opportunity, or they're training others.
Edit:
Never mind, no idea why I'm still seeing these
I know that we went rounds the other day, but genuinely, I'm curious why in this case you are critical of one of the only things that I've seen Democrats do in 9 months that is even slightly opposed to Republicans. I definitely wish that more was done, but given the lack of control in Congress at least protesting on the floor is better than nothing.
I mentioned it previously that I do think that you often post valuable content, even when I don't agree with the delivery. This feels like a situation where I would feel if even performative, we would agree that protesting is better than nothing.
Multiple answers under your comment... "Doesn't anyone have an answer for me?!?! I guess I'm just right about everything cuz no one had a rebuttal". Continues to ignore all the responses and whine like a toddler
You're not a serious person
Debatable, but at least I know how timestamps work...
Yeah you gotta wait more than 30 minutes before screaming to your mommy about lack of responses lol. Not surprised you're trying to distort reality more though. You're not a serious person.