this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12601 readers
950 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah because they spent money making it. If you spend millions of dollars making a video game, you can't just shut it down and refund every order of it without putting your studio in serious jeopardy financially. That's not an option for them, so the best they can do is just not rely on AI anymore. Clearly they tried it and learned that it actually sucks ass.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a small game. They have Palworld to rake in the big bucks, so if their stance on AI use has changed, they can just remove that game.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They're currently being sued by Nintendo and palworld did not make anywhere near the kind of money that would let them survive a lawsuit AND a game cancellation.

You're making assumptions about their financials that are only ever true for enormous studios like epic games, which pocketpair is not. The gaming industry does not operate as simply as you think it does and companies don't have the freedom to throw money away on something as simple as virtue signaling.

It doesn't matter if a company used AI back in 2022 when it was new and less understood; it matters what companies choose now. If you're going to throw blind skepticism at them for not making arbitrary financial risks just to appease you, then you're not worth appeasing anyway because you're too cynical to be a potential customer.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not making assumptions about their financial situation. I'm critical of their hypocrisy. I don't care about the excuses.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your expectations are too high and your cynicism is clouding your judgment.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My expectations are perfectly reasonable, and my cynical judgement of the industry keeps getting justified.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

You sound like me when I was young and stupid. Have a good one my dude