68
        this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
        
      
      68 points (98.6% liked)
      Linux
    9949 readers
  
      
      2081 users here now
      A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
        founded 2 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
"Take them at their word"
Who? Has there been a survey of contributors?
"Genuinely think that coreutils would be better if it were written in Rust"
I feel like the skill-level of the contributors is high enough that they would not be so naive.
Programs in different languages can compile to the same machine code. Any advantage would be in language constructs. But if you already have an existing C implementation what advantage do you do from a Rust implementation?
I personally write in 3 languages: Rust, C++, and Fortran ( or rarely SPARK). I don't port my code across languages, because there is no advantage. If I wanted it better, I would work on my existing codebase.
Porting really only helps if the original language was hindering development, deployment or runtime. These arguments don't really hold with C, a fast, low-dependency language that is more widely used than Rust.