Apple and Google will gladly erase the works of developers to chase profits.
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
744 points (97.3% liked)
Linux Phones
1618 readers
351 users here now
The Discussion on Linux-based Phones.
Benefits:
- Hardware freedom.
- Perfect operating-system competition.
- Full utilization of specs.
- Phone lifespan raises to 10+ years.
- Less e-waste.
Linux Mobile Distros:
- Ubuntu Touch
- Sailfish
- FuriOS
- Postmarket OS
- Mobian
- Pure OS
- Plasma Mobile
- LuneOS
- Nemomobile
- Droidian
- Mobile NixOS
- ExpidusOS
- Maemo Leste
- Manjaro Arm
- Tizen
- WebOS
Linux Mobile Hardware:
- Fairphone 5
- Volla Phone
- PinePhone
- FLX1
- Librem 5
⚙️Contribute
🧼Go Clean From the Duopoly:
💻Related Communities:
📰News:
💬Messager:
⌚️Watch:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Please let me know viable options.
There are no realistic linux options for your phone. These memes are pipe dreams by people that haven't actually looked at how utterly incapable linux currently is at powering a smart phone for normal daily use and how these apps that they're complaining about android and apple are removing won't run on the linux phone in the first place.
Sounds like switching will mean we will lose everything we're already losing. Might as well go ahead and quit cold turkey.
That is correct, currently, moving to a linux phone will lose you more than what you're losing with Google and Apple changes.
Apps are just part of the problem. Running a full linux OS on a phone with all the normal mobile phone capabilities is also an exercise in frustration. Taking Ubuntu Touch as an example, the OS has been around since 2011, was released in 2014 and it's list of approved phones is still minuscule. If you're a person on VZW, that list grows even smaller as VoLTE is problematic enough to be considered impossible to get working reliably.
I truly hope that the linux phone landscape shapes up but in it's current form, it's actually losing ground as it's development is slower than the hardware development and at it's current rate, will never be a viable option.
At this point I'd rather keep my freedom and lose the convenience. If it means losing apps and horsepower, fine by me. I'm already half resigned to going back to a dumbphone. I'm also looking at options to assemble my own phone with off the shelf parts if that's what it takes.
When you abandon freedom to achieve security, you lose both and deserve neither. - Thomas Jefferson
As read by Spock although Civilization a slightly different version attributed to Benjamin Franklin.
Yeah... I'm rapidly approaching the point of just learning to live without a smartphone altogether as it becomes more and more frustrating to find one that has what I want.
There's options, yes. Ubuntu Touch is getting better.
AFAIK, the main bottleneck (aside from hardware support) is a working open source IMS stack. IMS is the IP Multimedia Subsystem that is responsible for things like VoLTE/VoWIFI, SMS/MMS, etc. The last time I looked at Ubuntu Touch, it only supported baseband (not sure if that's the right term?) calls and SMS/MMS. Basically those only work in "3G" mode and won't work if your carrier requires VoLTE.
Lack of an open source IMS is also problematic for some other Android distros as well (and why flashing a newer GSI ROM to an older handset won't necessarily give you VoLTE).
And don't even get me started on the complete fustercluck that is RCS 😠
Sadly VoLTE isn't actually a standard and implemented differently by every vendor. Ubuntu Touch does support VoLTE on some of their supported devices these days, but it is an uphill battle due to the lack of a common standard.
Why isnt stolen license a thing?
That's funny I've had several Android apps run fine under Linux mobile OSes.
I'm not going to say they're ready for general public daily use but there's no reason they one day couldn't be? There's a foundation there. With a good enthusiast community we could get it to the point that it's at least useable for power users and grow from there.
Foundation? Well, consider me corrected, I'm clearly ready for pound town.
What's the point in the sarcasm?
There's never going to be some viable alternative to Android and iOS that just springs up out of nowhere fully developed ready for daily driving...
(I was echoing the other guy on the other half of your comment :P)
Several? Well, consider me corrected, it's clearly ready for prime time.
Thanks for not reading any of the rest of my comment
Thank you for starting with a contrary clickbait sentence, then immediately following it up with a confirmation of my comment that linux is not suitable as a mobile OS.
You're just a giant bundle of negativity and unpleasantness, aren't you?
And I'm starting to notice that being a bit more common from piefed users nowadays
UBPorts is a solid foundation. It just needs more adoption and backing.
All dreams start as pipe dreams. Every one.
https://pine64.org/devices/pinephone/ https://jolla.com/
I haven't used either of those directly but have started looking into linux on a tablet (Plasma mobile mainly) and things are definitely rough... nowhere near the polish of Android or iOS (understandably) and the app store options are not great / hacky
I'm just getting into things here, but my guess is that if you want to try a linux phone, if you're OK living in a world that's closer to the first days of smartphones than the current fairly-advanced smartphone, you might only be slightly or mildly frustrated. If you're looking for a modern smartphone experience, you're probably going to have a bad time.
That said, the lack of viable options for smartphones is terrible and it's somewhere I'd like to invest some time contributing to open-source projects to improve
the pinephone is NOT even remotely usable, i have one and it's hilariously terrible, even the most lightweight UI that literally just uses simple text dialog boxes for everything is slow and it's incredibly clunky.
That’s disappointing but good to know.
Get a Pixel 8 or 9 and install GrapheneOS. The recent changes to AOSP aren't some death knell for the project. Even if it were: using GOS on an older Pixel for the next five years or so is going to be way safer than alternatives.
I'll grant that whether or not this matters to someone depends on their personal threat model. My counter argument is to gesture broadly at the state of things. If they think the computing device they use most often shouldn't be their most reasonably secured and trustworthy computer then I'm not sure there's much else to discuss on the topic.
I want to be able to recommend any of the Linux phone projects or even something like Murena's new partnership with HIROH but they don't solve the problems GrapheneOS does.
The best breakdown of current options I've found is here: https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
Moving to phones made by google as a protest against google really seems weird. Sorry, but I will stick to the less secure options
This position misses the point entirely and introduces personal risk for no benefit. Buy a used Pixel if it makes you feel better about it. Then you're upcycling.
By less secure I mean lineageos or /e/os. How does it miss the point entirely?
Neither LineageOS nor /e/OS are comparable alternatives. They're significantly less secure than stock Android.
"I don't want to support Google so I refuse to use their hardware with an OS which, by default, prevents Google from achieving their objectives. Instead I'll use insecure platforms that still give Google most of what they want."
Android and Chrome are independent from Google in the same way that AT&T is independent from the NSA. The reality is that Google does what they want with both projects. Their main line of business is surveillance and those projects facilitate their business goals. GrapheneOS is developed for the Pixel platform because of the tight integration with Android from the hardware up.
This has allowed the GOS project to build a modified OS which is stripped of the default tooling and dependencies that give Google power over the device and its user's digital ecosystem. The same cannot be said for any other project at the moment.
Using Google's hardware to deny them access to the reasons they developed and produced that hardware to begin with directly spits in their face. It's more effective to buy hardware from Google, or buy one of their devices second-hand from a trusted source, and then modify it to achieve our goals while denying our would-be owners their own than to continue capitulating to their brand of Surveillance Capitalism.
I really want to understand this, but I don't find constructive information anywhere. Everything I read either doesn't really explain anything at all and is based on assumptions/opinions, or expect me to be a mobile os engineer.
Let's say I have a phone with lineageos, without google play services and without gapps, with most apps installed via f-droid and only a couple from aurora store. What power does google have over me, that wouldn't also have if I used a pixel with grapheneos?
In terms of security, If any threat involving physical access to the phone is statistically irrelevant for me, how is my phone less secure than stock android? And how would grapheneos improve my life?
To your last, it wouldn't. Graphene is smartly designed but everyone thinks you need all that security. Most people don't and wouldn't notice a damn bit of difference.
Lineage is offered on far more devices and if your main goal is just degoogling you get a lot more options without giving money to Google.
Cool, but in my country when O find a used pixel 8 it usually costs around 700 USD! Too much for the hardware..
You're absolutely correct. Living in the core of the empire or within one of its beneficiaries affords certain advantages which are made inaccessible to those outside of those regions. Your best approach is likely assuming your mobile device is compromised and only conducting sensitive activity on an inexpensive laptop you can reasonably secure.
Some secure-by-default Linux OSes I'd recommend are:
Parrot Security OS https://parrotsec.org/
Tails OS https://tails.net/
Qube OS https://www.qubes-os.org/
These are listed from most user-friendly to least. Signal has a desktop client that I'd be comfortable using on any of those three platforms.