Science

You are, intentionally or otherwise, distorting what I said. Who cares about "me" - yes I stopped recommending Fediverse tools bc it's useless to do so especially when the developers themselves don't even seem to care about making it a good platform to use for others besides themselves, meh it's their code and their right to do whatever they wish - but anyway I'm just one person.

What I said though was that journalists are writing articles saying how much Mastodon sucks. That could have been listened and responded to, but instead the concept was attempted to be buried, and the position of the person offering such rejected - exactly as you are doing here to me now btw, as if consent of the governed should not matter somehow, and they all just need to suck it up, get with the program, and use the same platform regardless of what it personally costs them? That btw is also the identical position of X as well.

I even included a link to one example of such an article. There are MANY others.

I hope you choose to be curious, rather than think that you already have the answer. There is so much more that I think that you are missing here. We seem to not have the same goal at all if I would like to entice people to use the platform but you would rather tell people that they "must" - that approach will not work out well in the end, imho, and you do not get to decide what is "better" in the minds of other people. If others likewise display it, that kind of hubris will continue to leave Mastodon in the forgotten bin of history. You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.