this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)
PC Gaming
12601 readers
1093 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Literally the second sentence in the article, if you’d bother to click on it.
The problem isn't that I "couldn't be bothered.". The problem is I don't care to believe such claims until I've seen the finished product. Is that better now? Or shall we keep assuming things?
Assume whatever you want. I’m just saying you asked a question that was immediately answered at the very top of the column. They say they scaled up the things to do with the size of the map. I’ve spent hundreds of hours on these games, and I don’t have a reason to doubt that they’d make a map this much larger without adding “things to do”.
I dropped off quickly from the last couple because I didn't find the things in the map to be all that engaging. Large maps tend to come with the Ubisoft formula of 'content' but rarely anything fun, in my experience.