Uplifting News

16732 readers

268 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

sga013@lemmy.world

wolfeh@lemmy.world

Flummoxed@lemmy.today

sga@lemmings.world

plantmoretrees@lemm.ee

Aatube@kbin.melroy.org

Aatube@lemmy.world

NickwithaC@lemmy.world

sga@piefed.social

[Meta] Negativity in Comments (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Aatube@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently, we merry mods have been noticing many-a-comments being in the report queue for perceived negativity (the aim of the community being to provide "a break from the incessant negativity and rage"). What actions should we do about these, if any? Do we need a newsome another-rule for this?

Here's what I think: Some skepticism and scrutiny is always quite needed knowledge—especially against information that's actually untrue/misleading—and any bars I can think of for removing negative comments would apply to reasonable skepticism as well. Thus, the mod team is asking y'all to drop some bars!

Edit

Assorted examples of reported comments

Actually, you’ve missed the mark. It’s not whining about an advancement, it’s legitimate criticism of the US health industry. He’s just saying what we all know to be true which is that regardless of technological improvements, lifesaving care will continue to be ruinously expensive for those that are able to access it and gatekept from many others.

If you have a problem with comments like these undermining celebration of scientific progress, then maybe you should think about the structural political issues that lead people to disillusionment and cynicism rather than labeling people as conspiracy theorists.

You know “big red“ voted for Trump. It’s a cute story, but I hope he gets what he voted for In the end

It’s too bad that curing patients is not a sustainable business model. Even if this did work we would only ever see it developed if you had to take it twice a month for the rest of your life in order to survive.

Edit: sorry, I just noticed this is in Uplifting News. So, let’s be optimistic. Maybe global capitalism will collapse and governments will start trying to take care of people.

Nobody said anything about ICE, we’re talking about the military known for bombing weddings in multiple middle eastern countries and then bombing ambulances when they respond.

If you have the money to commit atrocities in a dozen countries at once, you have money to spare.

That’s .world for you; complaining about Reddit while trying to recreate it exactly

It’s very sad to see hype like this. They only had 30 enrolled, this was just a safety study, and while the data looks promising, there is certainly not enough statistical power, which is why there is no approval yet.

Shame on the BBC. If you are going to quote invesigators, you should state that they have paid consultancy deals with UniQure. The same two people were equally excited about a Roche therapy years ago…

But UniCure stock went up 200% today, which is the point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the last example was under "Huntington's disease successfully treated for first time". the importance of the news comes from the fact that treatment was even effective on 30 patients. that said the comment's also a reasonable amount of skepticism, so i too have much higher levels of opposition against removing it.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

And it makes sense that it was not a FULL rebuttal, only adding context (that the reporters were over-hyping it from the actual science done, which tbh is far more common than not these days). Truth is stranger - and more complex - than Fiction, after all. I see no schadenfreude in it at all, yes it is "negative" but in a way that is helpful, it is respectful, and polite (as much as can be expected). I suppose I can see from some people's perspective though that it does NOT serve as a break from the incessant negativity and rage, because it changes the hopeful outlook to rage-inducing for the media hype, although then as people said it goes back to hope again. Yes, a tricky business indeed to figure that one out...

I like how you left it to the community to decide via their votes exactly how relevant it is. If it had simply said something like "get bent BBC and UniQure", then yes remove it unequivocally, but since it is on the line... leave it to the entire community rather than have to take on that burden all by yourselves?