this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)
PC Gaming
12394 readers
630 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sure but searching for llamas didn't take over fifteen minutes.
You ever played the Sims 3 on a minimum spec laptop?
Searching for llamas absolutely did take 15 minutes.
I mean... It did on my POS computer. 🤷♂️
Then it's probably time to upgrade from that 8088.
They forgot to press turbo.
Turbo was on by default. Pressing the button to turn it off made the computer run slower to emulate an 8086, so that software coded to calculate time based on instruction cycles rather then using a proper real time clock function wouldn't run faster than the intended speed.
An 8088 wouldn't have a turbo button since it ran at the same speed as an 8086 to begin with.
(Also, SimCity 2000 required at least a 386.)
while true, BUT: everyone I knew at the time, who had turbo buttons on their systems, told me that it made the computer faster and could lead to the computer breaking if it was left on all the time. So they just had the turbo off :|
I've been told this kind of belief was VERY common.
I mean, at the time when turbo buttons were a thing (and I was a kid who didn't know much about computers yet), I incorrectly thought that too. My own computers never had one though, and I'd like to think that if one had, I would've eventually figured out that it worked opposite to how the label implied.