this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
190 points (98.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12394 readers
519 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 101 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Predatory as hell. Almost impressive how Valve manages to simultaneously be one of the best and one of the worst companies in gaming.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Best or worst, aim for No. 1!

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just goes to show the dire state the rest of the industry is in.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

They shot themselves in the foot in my opinion. I just won’t play video games that have that gambling aspect to them. I already spend enough on trading cards for that thrill

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 week ago

“Best of the worst”.

Best of both Worsts.

[–] pory@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Let the live service cattle subsidize the best platform for buying non-slop games. Easy math.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's completely optional. They are about as predatory as gucci bags or other designer shit some people pay way too much for (IMO). You don't need any of it to be competitive or to continue enjoying the game.

I just personally don't have a problem with things that exploit people's vanity.

[–] nuggie_ss@lemmings.world -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I just personally don’t have a problem with things that exploit people’s vanity.

Based, but these are predatory.

For one, we shouldn't be lowering our standards so that a business can make more money. Whether you accept it or not, these vanity items do make the game more enjoyable for most players. If more of us had higher standards, we'd get the cosmetics without having to pay for a corporation's nicer campus or an executive's 9th property.

For two, whenever chance is involved it will always intrinsically prey upon those with gambling problems.