this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
321 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25647 readers
2506 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 150 points 1 day ago (6 children)

If companies stop reporting quarterly, then all of the bad news is going to come all at once at the end of the of most companies fiscal year in the fall. Since it’s every industry, the entire market will surge or sink every fall. If people had insider knowledge, well that’s a yearly wealth transfer from your 401k to the 1%.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago

I'm just thinking that Taco wants it to be timed right after things, like, oh, say, midterm elections.

Next up will be “get rid of annual reporting”. They’ll change it to be “every 4 years, the first Tuesday after the presidential election”.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

If companies stop reporting quarterly, then all of the bad news is going to come all at once at the end of the of most companies fiscal year in the fall.

Also, it isn't as though they won't have internal reports. And given the deplorable state of the SEC, I have to assume this would lead to some wild insider trading in between annual releases.

If people had insider knowledge, well that’s a yearly wealth transfer from your 401k to the 1%.

It's arguably worse than that. People passing around unregulated reports under the table can still lie to one another with abandon. So the black market for inside info is ripe for fraud and scams which can't even be prosecuted normally, because its not information anyone has to report out to a public commission.

If I want to come in and release the "Double Super Secret Real Microsoft Numbers" and spread it around, I can effectively manipulate the price of the stock based on how many people I can dupe into believing my phony figures.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Alternatively, global investors will start to shun the US, because US companies don't have to be as transparent anymore. Then there is a giant sucking sound of capital out of US markets, and the stock market and dollar tanks.

You would think that a President would want to avoid this, but most of his wealth is now in crypto, and if the dollar tanks his crypto is worth more dollars.

He is so transparently out for his own gain, and those of his Crypto Broligarch friends, over what is best for the country as a whole.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

He also owns a large portion of a publicly traded company and is seeking to be able to obscure his finances there more than they already are.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An awful lot of crypto seems to track along with the American stock market. Maybe not an exact mirror, but if watch big drops/gains in S&P, you'll usually see big drops/gains in something like BTC, anyway.

Not sure about Taco's shitcoins, though.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No, but if the dollar tanks then crypto arbitrage bots will make sure the value of the dollar vs. crypto tanks along with it. People invested in crypto (but who live in dollars) get a big win at the expense of everyone else.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

global investors will start to shun the US

Where would investors go instead? The UK, EU, and Japan already eliminated quarterly disclosure requirements.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

You would think that would happen but I doubt it at this point.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Now, now... "and switching to semiannual instead."

So they steal all our money twice a year. :)