this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
840 points (97.9% liked)
People Twitter
8171 readers
3113 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm a Stephen king fan, so by the time I finish one of his books he's written 3 more
Stephen King is the opposite of G. R. R. Martin
they should have a child together who writes at the perfect rate
But Stephen King already writes at the perfect rate.
someone should tell him not to write anything on Twitter though
or why is he tweeted what he did regarding the Epstein list
I feel like his completion of the dark tower is on par with grim’s GOT wrap up.
He defended The List recently, so fuck him.
Idk what that is
The Epstein list. He basically said it was fake. He's always been an asshole as far as I'm concerned, but I've usually agreed with his political tweets (or whatever he uses that people post). I have no loyalty to him, and find it strange that he would claim it was made up.
Does it make his books worse?
It makes it suspect that the books may have been written by a pedophile (overlooking things like the orgy in IT). Odd thing to defend the Epstein files if you aren't one.
I'm not sure I understand how saying something doesn't exist is defending it?
I don't know how you believe it doesn't exist
There's been talk of it for YEARS, but still nothing has come of it. To me it seems like a coverup, but I'm a paranoid conspiratorialist. Its not exactly a leap for someone else to conclude that it hasn't come out because it doesn't exist. So how is not believing in something defending it?
I mean, I still don't know what it's actually supposed to be.
That's you being ignorant and burying your head in the sand (mostly applies if you're American, you get a little more leeway if you're not). The Epstein files are supposed to at the very least contain a client list of people who went to the island, who most could come to the conclusion were only there to rape children. Any more questions, look it up, it is very reported on
"Supposed to". According to?... Also, must be the fucking dumbest criminal, having a list of their partners and clients with full names all written down.