this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
193 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3311 readers
1010 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Free speech advocates fear a new bill could let the Secretary of State strip passports from US citizens based on their speech. "Rubio has claimed the power to designate people terrorist supporters based solely on what they think and say," one said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thank you. I was wrong. democrats are occasionally willing to use the filibuster instead of just letting republicans use it to block things democrats ran on but never had any intention of passing. Now, how many times did republicans use the filibuster during biden's first 9 months in office?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know, because filibusters are also an implicit threat. Plenty of bills from both parties never even come to vote because both sides know they will be filibustered.

When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it's because the majority wanted to put the minority "on the record", for example as pro-trans.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans.

And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration?