this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
574 points (95.0% liked)

People Twitter

8149 readers
2346 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
574
Calling BS. Pics Or It Didn't Happen (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 day ago by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
149 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

xcancel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 57 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Already proven a hoax

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

Clowns all of them.

Apparently the bullets did have some engravings, but they said benign shit like "Here fascist, catch!" and "If you read this, you are gay LMAO", but nothing antifa or trans related

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

What's the Source: ?

I wanna share it with others who still believe it's true

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 45 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

On September 11, 2025, The Wall Street Journal issued a caution regarding its earlier report on an internal law-enforcement bulletin concerning the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk. The bulletin had mentioned ammunition found near the scene with “transgender and anti-fascist ideology” engravings, but the Justice Department indicated the report might not accurately reflect the messages on the ammunition as the probe was in its early stages.

This is statement from the WSJ

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So they walked back their own claim, good good good.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 22 points 18 hours ago

Make it, rile up the right, then admit later (quietly) that they were wrong. Corporate media standard.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

They're walking back a claim that was so stupid that it could only be made up by a conspiracy theory idiot.

Yet they made it. Top notch US journalism here people

Now they're somewhat walking it back but that doesn't matter, that walking back part will be ignored, the damage has been done

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Yup, it was said, now it is truth to a lot of people

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Probably the person making the more believable claim.