Linux

9995 readers

489 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

What is the performance difference between live booting from a USB pen, and installed on an eMMC drive? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 month ago by thatonecoder@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am not quite ready to switch to a GNU/Linux yet, but I have live booted Linux Mint Xfce yesterday, with most things working, but much worse for launching times, etc. Would it be any different if I installed it on my eMMC drive? Since they are both based on NAND flash memory, I am clueless about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Installed will be faster.

But you should note that emmc systems are not intended for heavy use. They have a much shorter wearout lifespan than SSDs. If you or your OS do a lot of writing to disk, you might end up with a failure.

Just be aware of that possibility, and have backups.