So programmers are now basically the equivalent of in-shop publishing house editors, or a better analogy, a script-doctor in the hollywood production scene.

A company vibe-codes something that is cheap and shitty, then has to pay an editor to actually make it usable.

I hate this timeline...just pay the person to create the code in the first place....

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

That's kinda always been how technology changes jobs, though, by slowly making the job one of supervising the technology. I'm no longer carving a piece of wood myself, but I'm running the CNC machine by making sure it's doing things properly and has everything it needs to work properly. I'm not physically stabbing the needle through the fabric every time, myself, but I am guiding the sewing machine path on that fabric. I'm not feeding fuel into the oven to maintain a particular temperature, but I am relying on the thermocouple to turn the heating element on and off to maintain the assigned equilibrium that I'll use to bake food.

Many jobs are best done as a team effort between human and machine. Offloading the tedious tasks to the machine so that you can focus on the bigger picture is basically what technology is for. And as technology changes, we need to always be able to recalibrate which tasks are the tedious ones that machines do better, and which are the higher level decisions best left to humans.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I will gladly take up one of these jobs as long as they allow me to trash all generated code and just rewrite it from scratch. It'll be faster than any sort of cleanup.