this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
217 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3305 readers
946 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mcbenavides85@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when republicans went after Clinton for a consensual bj? Times have changed.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nothing with a power dynamic like that can ever be consensual.

[–] mcbenavides85@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Still better than fucking kids.

[–] for_some_delta@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Former President Clinton was named during the event. Being named as being on a trip with Epstein is not proof of misconduct, but listen to a great Bob Vylan track like lynch your leaders or something.

[–] mcbenavides85@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I know Clinton is probably guilty too, but my point was the republicans went after him during that time period for a bj. Not sure when Epstein became the pedo lord for rich fucks.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I ain't interested in getting into an argument about what kind of rape is better.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't know why you're getting downvoted. Rape is rape. This isn't the rape Olympics or something.

Because it's disgusting,. An adult woman feeling pressured to consent because of a power differential is absolutely not even in the same galaxy as literal child sex slaves being unable to say no because they're literally child sex slaves. It's horrific to equivocate the two, and it's a transparent attempt to downplay the hypocrisy being highlighted while "both-sides"ing the issue.